There was a slight mistake in calculating the calibration marginalized likelihood which showed up in a difference between the offiical bilby samples and dingo's samples. This has now been corrected, the reason for this bug is included in the following calculation:
There was a slight mistake in calculating the calibration marginalized likelihood which showed up in a difference between the offiical bilby samples and dingo's samples. This has now been corrected, the reason for this bug is included in the following calculation: