Open dinhnhobao opened 4 years ago
Hi there. Good eye!
Marked as Not in Scope. We know there is no indendation, but for easy readability (by aligning the text on the left), we still left it there. Also, we purposely bolded the point that the subpoint(s) is/are referring to, to make it even clearer.
Severity : very low because this is purely cosmetic and no usage effects.
Cheers!
Team chose [response.NotInScope
]
Reason for disagreement: Correct indentation is absolutely required for the syntax of use cases. As you can see, in AB3, , and in our module website,
the indentation must be there, also with no bolds.
Your use cases did not abide by the syntax requirements of use cases as shown above. This is a "formatting" error as in below:
I agree that this is a severity.VeryLow
bug nevertheless.
Team chose [severity.VeryLow
]
Originally [severity.Low
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Similar for other use cases