Open mauricioaniche opened 4 years ago
Moreover, while the false positive rate seems low, the false discovery rate is a bit high. Do you see a way of improving it?
Thanks @mauricioaniche . Answers below.
1) FP might be wrong due to some cross validations without positive cases. I did not bother myself fixing it because I just gave up trying to correctly label the positives results.
2) False Discovery Rate can be tuned by using F-score with different 'beta'. I am planning to do it next following requirements from medical researchers.
Hi, Diogo! Thanks for this notebook. It's the best I've seen so far.
Question: at the end of your notebook, it says
False Positives: 96.3% +- 5.1%
. Is that correct? The FP rate is 96% Or am I missing something?