Closed Electronickss closed 7 years ago
Sure! Either would be fine. Are you interested to collect these?
Is there a good way to verify that info? I can add some of what I found but I'm not 100% on how correct it is
Wikipedia style, do your best and if there are omissions or errors, just depend on others to help out.
I can give some help into this work if you want to.
From what I found:
*4.8.0-26.28 for Ubuntu 16.10
*4.4.0-45.66 for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
*3.13.0-100.147 for Ubuntu 14.04 LTS
*3.2.0-113.155 for Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
*3.16.36-1+deb8u2 for Debian 8
*3.2.82-1 for Debian 7
*4.7.8-1 for Debian unstable
^patched versions
If anyone wants to start a pull on the wiki. @unixfox ?
@Electronickss Sure, maybe create a dedicated page for that ?
*4.4.26-1 for ArchLinux (linux-lts package)
*4.8.3 for ArchLinux (linux package)
Yeah that's what I was thinking. There's also a spot in the vulnerability details page where it mentions the date it was patched. We could link to the list of patches page. It would probably be nice for less experienced users to include:
Check your version with
uname -ar
Or something like that
shameless plug
In case it could help, there are instructions for patching RHEL/CentOS 6.x here: https://github.com/kcgthb/RHEL6.x-COW
Excellent. Thank you @Electronickss
And everyone else that contributed of course 👍 :-)
Would it be possible to get either in the wiki or gist attached to this page, a list of distro's and the patched kernel version?