Open prk-dismoi opened 3 years ago
@MaartenLMEM @JalilArfaoui @felix-lambert your feedback welcome on PART 1 i.e. how the reporting tool should look like on the contribution screen UI. 2 options below.
The bottom bar of the contribution itself where the icons are is locked, so they are visible at all time. The contribution scrolls above it.
Personally I prefer 2 as its consistent in the use of icons. Also worried version 1 makes it a but confusing i.e. is it the bin that is used to report?
Also worried version 1 makes it a but confusing i.e. is it the bin that is used to report?
Right it's confusing. For option 1, the way to make it work is putting trash and heart on one side, and "signaler un problème" alone on the other side.
Still my favourite. good stuff on the right, bad stuff on the left, no highlighted (center) item, and no translation required.
Still my favourite. good stuff on the right, bad stuff on the left, no highlighted (center) item, and no translation required.
Like it too … with text on hover (mouse) or long press (touch screen)
1st solution seems me the most suitable solution for now.
I would just rename it "Signaler un problème"
. Because "signaler ce contenu
" looks a kind of legal report.
I prefer it to your favourite @prk-dismoi for two reasons :
As a user I dont see your concerns as a problem. Personally if I want to help I would naturally use the flag, but maybe it's an english thing. With the sentence I also feel we're putting the focus too prominently on negativity. Problem is not a happy word, feels like we're unsure and that problems could be looming around every corner. Emphasising the feedback gathering aspect of it is a bit detrimental to the UI, so if we decide getting feedback on mismatch is of primary importance here, then we can go for 1. If not I still find my fav more fitting (we can work out the spacing).
Feedback welcome on this one. Wording, etc...
As a user I dont see your concerns as a problem. Personally if I want to help I would naturally use the flag, but maybe it's an english thing.
There is a difference. But can"t say if it is consequent, thus if it is worth regarding default on user side you underlined : negativity.
With the sentence I also feel we're putting the focus too prominently on negativity. Problem is not a happy word, feels like we're unsure and that problems could be looming around every corner.
I agree about this risk. Hard to measure, but a real fact for people who will see it.
Emphasising the feedback gathering aspect of it is a bit detrimental to the UI, so if we decide getting feedback on mismatch is of primary importance here, then we can go for 1. If not I still find my fav more fitting (we can work out the spacing).
Thanks for pointing out these stakes. Let's go on ideal UI for user, I mean with a flag. I we need more feedback at a some time or another, we ll have the label "problem" option.
About reasons of flagging, I would not mention "arnaque". It supposes it can exist, that is not good for trust. Also people choose who they follow. We are not here to tell some contributor to shut up because a consumer finds it not worth.
Same for spam. It can be a feeling, but we have to make it impossible. If I receive messages I do no like, I can unfollow easily.
To sum up and add some new ideas :
`Cette contribution
Remarques : ____
Mail : ____ *L'application est anonyme, c'est notre seul moyen de vous contacter pour en savoir plus.
[ ] Me désabonner du contributeur [Valider]
Remarques : Mail : ____ *L'application est anonyme, c'est notre seul moyen de vous contacter pour en savoir plus.
@MaartenLMEM Perso as a random user (but thats only me) I would never add notes here, and would still question why you want my email. "I told you what I had to say with the radio buttons, and dont have time/will to further help you improve your app, its not that important to me, I'm just browsing the web on my phone while waiting for the bus" (random use case).
We might also need full screen for this UI. Not saying it should not be done, but for MVP compliance I would just recommend the 4 radios only? I will try to mock it up nevertheless so we can see how it could look.
I agree, not sure at all mail field is a good idea, and obviously not MVP. Yes, keep it simple, easier to handle technically also.
Spoke with @MaartenLMEM. We're both good with the light (left) version initially. Will Zeplin it shortly.
Derniers détails :
Cette contribution => Cette contribution...
illégale
Derniers détails :
- Cette contribution => Cette contribution...
- illégal~e~
@MaartenLMEM
A feature to enable users to report content. Initially a store compliance requirement, will extend to include a quality feedback mechanism.