Closed TNgidi closed 5 years ago
Need to create new aggregations. Not really problematic.
The changes to the form will be a bit challenging. See #458.
@TNgidi I updated the aggregations and the new config is live on stage as version 1.0.15.
Thanks for the information @Nicolaidavies, I will test now
I don't know if the coverage calculations are correct. is the screen show below I think we should show atleast 0.0.... something because there structures sprayed
Strange, I haven't touched anything with the coverage. The refused and locked will show up as 0 until we create new fake_forms
.
@TNgidi Please take a look at the instance tarajuke-287
it has coverage showing up correctly.
@Nicolaidavies On this instance “testingcoverage” I have added some records with structures that match the columns on the table (locked first visit, locked mop up, refused first visit, refused mop up) but the table still shows 0 %
Please check Sameen's update on https://github.com/disarm-platform/user-requests-and-feedback/issues/87
@Nicolaidavies is OK to add records for more testing to your instance ID tarajuke-287 ?
This change was deployed to staging and production.
Confirmed working by Sameen. Moving to 'Review/QA'
Done
@onlyjsmith commented on Thu Jul 19 2018
External feedback source: https://github.com/disarm-platform/user-requests-and-feedback/issues/87 Currently we have the following 2 columns on the far right of the dashboard:
% Refused (# structures unsprayed where Reason == Refused) and % Locked (# structures sprayed where Reason == Locked)
We want to split this into:
% Refused First Visit (# structures unsprayed (first visit) where Reason == Refused) % Refused Mop-up (# structures unsprayed (mop-up) where Reason == Refused) % Locked First Visit (# structures sprayed (first visit) where Reason == Locked) % Locked Mop-up (# structures sprayed (mop-up) where Reason == Locked)
This is dependent on #86 where there will be separate questions for number unsprayed first visit vs. number unsprayed mop-up