Fixed the rules screwing up the syntax highlighting.
Here are the benchmarks for finalizing the double backtick inline codeblocks:
The input of "`test` ``test``" copy-pasted 500 times has been benchmarked in the following results.
Old (Without double backtick inline codeblock support): average parse time of ~450-460 milliseconds.
New (With double backtick inline codeblock support): average parse time of ~460-600 milliseconds.
The same tests as above has been benchmarked but also with the benchmark text found in the samples for the following results.
Old (Without double backtick inline codeblock support): average parse time of ~760-830 milliseconds.
New (With double backtick inline codeblock support): average parse time of ~950-1090 milliseconds.
VoltrexKeyva
commented
3 years ago
Fixed the rules screwing up the syntax highlighting.
Here are the benchmarks for finalizing the double backtick inline codeblocks:
The input of "`test` ``test``" copy-pasted 500 times has been benchmarked in the following results.
Old (Without double backtick inline codeblock support): average parse time of ~450-460 milliseconds. New (With double backtick inline codeblock support): average parse time of ~460-600 milliseconds.
The same tests as above has been benchmarked but also with the benchmark text found in the samples for the following results.
Old (Without double backtick inline codeblock support): average parse time of ~760-830 milliseconds. New (With double backtick inline codeblock support): average parse time of ~950-1090 milliseconds.
There are no performance regressions.