Closed benzimmer closed 2 years ago
See #229 for more details.
The test case might seem a bit weird, but I didn't find a more elegant way to reproduce Sidekiq's middleware initialization. So definitely open for suggestions.
@mperham what do you think of the workaround? I guess param handling changes between 2.7 / 2.8 / 3.0 are a bit of a sore point?
Lgtm!
thanks @benzimmer !
See #229 for more details.
The test case might seem a bit weird, but I didn't find a more elegant way to reproduce Sidekiq's middleware initialization. So definitely open for suggestions.