discourse / prometheus_exporter

A framework for collecting and aggregating prometheus metrics
MIT License
525 stars 153 forks source link

Not compatible with Redis 5 #249

Closed KludgeKML closed 1 year ago

KludgeKML commented 1 year ago

The Redis 5 gem introduces changes that cause a rails abort when the prometheus middleware is included.

These lines: https://github.com/discourse/prometheus_exporter/blob/main/lib/prometheus_exporter/middleware.rb#L14-L18

...try to patch Redis::Client#call and Redis::Client#call_pipeline , but these methods are no longer available in Redis::Client.

I'm not 100% sure if this is a breaking change in Redis that hasn't been communicated very well, or if it's prometheus_exporter relying on methods that aren't part of Redis::Client's public interface.

Steps to replicate:

PrometheusExporter::Middleware.new(nil)


Rails crashes on initialisation with:

gems/prometheus_exporter-2.0.3/lib/prometheus_exporter/instrumentation/method_profiler.rb:75:in alias_method': undefined methodcall' for class `Redis::Client' (NameError)

alias_method :call__mp_unpatched, :call ^^^^^^^^^^^^

SamSaffron commented 1 year ago

Yikes, care to make a PR to add cross compatibility here?

I guess we should fish for the right method and then path the correct one.

@byroot what is the right way of getting this instrumentation in Redis 5?

byroot commented 1 year ago

Redis 5 use redis-client under the hood, abd redis-client have a public middleware API for instrumentation purposes.

Just look at redis-client’s README.

Le 25 oct. 2022 à 01:07, Sam @.***> a écrit :

 Yikes, care to make a PR to add cross compatibility here?

I guess we should fish for the right method and then path the correct one.

@byroot what is the right way of getting this instrumentation in Redis 5?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

SamSaffron commented 1 year ago

I see:

Instrumentation and Middlewares

redis-client offers a public middleware API to aid in monitoring and library extension. Middleware can be registered either globally or on a given configuration instance.

module MyGlobalRedisInstrumentation def connect(redis_config) MyMonitoringService.instrument("redis.connect") { super } end

def call(command, redis_config) MyMonitoringService.instrument("redis.query") { super } end

def call_pipelined(commands, redis_config) MyMonitoringService.instrument("redis.pipeline") { super } end end RedisClient.register(MyGlobalRedisInstrumentation)

MethodProfiler is technically cheaper (no extra yielding etc...) but this can certainly work.

byroot commented 1 year ago

(no extra yielding etc...)

The yielding is just for the example. The only overhead of the instrumentation API is calling super which is about as cheap as you can do.

SamSaffron commented 1 year ago

This should fix it... https://github.com/discourse/prometheus_exporter/pull/250

@byroot is there a cleaner way of testing without needing the full dance here. Ideally I don't want to force people to install redis just so for tests, but I guess if it is better we can.

byroot commented 1 year ago

Depends how much certainty you want.

You can call RedisClient::Middlewares.call, call_pipelined and connect directly if you wish to just unit test your integration without having to connect to redis.

SamSaffron commented 1 year ago

Fixed per #250

Thanks heaps for reporting and thanks for all the help @byroot :hugs:

booleanbetrayal commented 1 year ago

Thanks all! Possible to get a RubyGem version bump to support this change?

SamSaffron commented 1 year ago

sure, will push a version today

On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 6:00 AM Brent Dearth @.***> wrote:

Thanks all! Possible to get a RubyGem version bump to support this change?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/discourse/prometheus_exporter/issues/249#issuecomment-1307689516, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAABIXLW3O4EBULQFOAFGXDWHKPNXANCNFSM6AAAAAARMY3654 . You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.Message ID: @.***>

booleanbetrayal commented 1 year ago

Thanks @SamSaffron !