Closed GregBakker closed 5 years ago
I see the PR uses the IterativeClusterFit for "high" quality - it is extremely slow with minimal gains compared to the ClusterFit. Unless anyone can produce evidence otherwise to support its inclusion, I'd suggest it not be used as it will considerably degrade user experience.
pr #6 adds enabling / disabling UI. I haven't removed the 'high' quality yet - to confirm, the recommendation is 'fast' and 'normal', normal being ClusterFit [which I believe is the default]
@exscriber you might be interested in this too :)
It`s fine to leave only 'fast' and 'normal' quality settings: Fast for draft renders (or last minute renders on notebook) Normal for normal renders
fixed in pr #9
Tracking the progress of the quality settings that were introduced in pr #4
Issue to be closed after testing complete + mac / win builds uploaded.