Open emanuel-sygal opened 5 years ago
I think what @emanuel-sygal means by this is the formula for Rj is wrong.
It should be R_1 = (R - sigma_2)/(sigma1-sigma2) and R_2 = (R - sigma_1)/(sigma1-sigma2) and not R_j = (R-sigma_j)/(sigma_1 - sigma_2).
This stumped me for a while. With the incorrect formula the initial condition of x_i_0, y_i_0 = 1, 1 isn't satisfied.
Thanks so much for the excellent article in general though, this is really topic quality exposition
E.g. the equation for R^k has the indices of R_2 and R_1 swapped.