Open Legionof7 opened 6 years ago
constraining media to a spectrum of left<>right is problematic.
the far left and far right are both anti-government.
perhaps another spectrum? or many?
On Tue, 15 May 2018, 2:14 pm Legionof7, notifications@github.com wrote:
Name:
Token Curated Registry for Media Sites This is a terrible name but and I'd love better suggestions :) Purpose:
This TCR has two purposes.
- List sites that use legitimate information/data in writing their stories and opinion pieces.
2.Reveal the general political leaning of news sites. In other words, transparency is the new objectivity. No news site can be free of bias, but if they reveal their bias than readers can take this into account while they read.
The TCR is designed to be very simple and do a few things very well. Description:
There are three actors in this district:
- Lister:Listers are news sites that want to list their site onto the registry. They put a token deposit when they apply and their deposit is refunded if their site is listed. If the site is rejected, their deposit is distributed to the voting tokenholders.
2.Tokenholder:Tokenholders vote using a Partial Lock Commit/Reveal https://github.com/ConsenSys/PLCRVoting method. They can also call challenges against applications and listings.
3.Reader:Readers are people that utilize the TCR to gain information. Application
The application that listers send should include the URL to their news site. They should also state their political leaning (very liberal, liberal, neutral, conservative, very conservative). The articles should not be locked behind a paywall so that voters have enough information to make a decision. Incentives
Listers are incentivized to apply so that they can get more readers. Tokenholders are incentivzed to deny bad applications in order to claim the deposit. They are also incentivized to accept good applications in order to build a good list that listers want to apply to. More Info
For more info about TCR, challenges, and parameters, please visit this. https://medium.com/@ilovebagels/token-curated-registries-1-0-61a232f8dac7 Ethereum Address:
0x6098266fd3B487492f73f7967b37c98357851161
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/district0x/district-proposals/issues/264, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/Adg2XYG-38KYwai5l06Oelu4kBWlOBlkks5tyjoUgaJpZM4T-yFX .
constraining media to a spectrum of left<>right is problematic. the far left and far right are both anti-government. perhaps another spectrum? or many?
Yeah, I'm not sure left<-->right is a great spectrum though I don't think it's terrible. Maybe each site can write a short blurb about their usual position/view.
Great proposal. Anything that benefits those outside the direct participants is a great TCR
@Legionof7 I agree, looking at political leaning from right and left lacks dimension. I'm curious, what's your opinion of tools like this: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cctv-america/
You as well @imdying ^
@Legionof7 I agree, looking at political leaning from right and left lacks dimension. I'm curious, what's your opinion of tools like this: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cctv-america/
I like the Mediabiasfactcheck site though I have seen complaints (that I haven't fully looked into) about it. The issue with these centralized solutions is that even if they are completely fair (which isn't possible), people still won't trust it. It's hard to say that a decentralized solution isn't trusted unless all the tokenholders were strongly biased one way (and they're economically incentivized not too).
@Bradymck
Hey @Legionof7 I'm starting up a new way to curate proposals for our district spotlight blog post. I'm going to be diving into your proposal a bit more on stream. Though I'm doing it in a way that allows the stream viewers to curate the blog post rather than me. Stay tuned. I'll give you news soon.
Important Note:This is not a community. Some people have come to me and have been confused by this. The purpose of this isn't to create a platform with all the functions that a community should have. Avsa wrote this which I think covers communities pretty well:https://docs.google.com/document/d/10JfZ-6TC48lDqhJh_lGqIBu5KgcuHHYwdd0vo1pD59Y/edit
This should be a tool to allow discussions within communities to function and as a "database of truth".
Also, proposed name, District 42 because 42 is the ultimate truth ;)
Hey there! Just a reminder. We just launched the District Registry.
If you are still working on this project, be sure to submit it to the registry if you want to see it built as one of the next districts.
We will be deprecating the old voting app and Github proposal system now that the registry is live.
If you aren't working on this be sure to stake your DNT into the districts you want to see remain in the Registry. https://registry.district0x.io/
Your staked tokens act as an 'Upvote' within the registry. Similar to any TCR, you will also receive a portion of the challenge rewards if anyone ever challenges the district. So be sure to migrate any tokens you used in the old voting app.
I will be streaming today now that the registry looks stable and people are beginning to stake DNT. We will dive in, answer all your questions and help get you started. Hope to see you later today!
Stream: https://www.twitch.tv/district0x
Hey @Legionof7,
I'm not sure if you're aware but we recently launched a new bounty to migrate your proposals to the actual District Registry: https://registry.district0x.io/
We're replacing the old voting app with the registry. Let me know if you need help but I would love to see you migrate this over so you can claim your DNT.
It does take a 10,000 DNT submit to submit your proposal but this gives you an extra 2000 you can stake in the registry beyond the deposit amount.
Hit me up on Telegram or Discord if you need help or have questions.
Telegram: https://t.me/district0x/75217 Discord: https://discord.gg/P9RQejv
PS, please excuse the canned response. I am encouraging everyone here to start migrating so they can claim their 12000 DNT.
Name:
Token Curated Registry for Media Sites A.K.A The Tokenization/Securitization of Truth This is a terrible name but and I'd love better suggestions :)
Purpose:
This TCR has two purposes.
List sites (could also be people, oracles, etc.) that use legitimate information/data in writing their stories and opinion pieces.
Reveal the general political leaning of news sites. In other words, transparency is the new objectivity. No news site can be free of bias, but if they reveal their bias than readers can take this into account while they read.
The TCR is designed to be very simple and do a few things very well.
Description:
There are three actors in this district:
Lister:Listers are news sites that want to list their site onto the registry. They put a token deposit when they apply and their deposit is refunded if their site is listed. If the site is rejected, their deposit is distributed to the voting tokenholders.
Tokenholder:Tokenholders vote using a Partial Lock Commit/Reveal method. They can also call challenges against applications and listings.
Reader:Readers are people that utilize the TCR to gain information.
Essentially, this would be an unordered TCR (at least in the beginning), eventually, this could grow to a nested TCR for more functions.
Tokens
DNT (District Network Token) is used to govern the infrastructure/protocol of the TCR.
A token specific to this district is used to vote. (A security token?)
Application
The application that listers send should include the URL to their news site. They should also state their political leaning (very liberal, liberal, neutral, conservative, very conservative). The articles should not be locked behind a paywall so that voters have enough information to make a decision.
Maybe there could be an API built so that other services can query source data for display on their own site. This could cost a very small amount of token or ETH and it would give additional benefit to tokenholders.
Incentives
Listers are incentivized to apply so that they can get more readers. Tokenholders are incentivzed to deny bad applications in order to claim the deposit. They are also incentivized to accept good applications in order to build a good list that listers want to apply to.
More Info
For more info about TCR, challenges, and parameters, please visit this.
Challenges
XKCD
https://vitalik.ca/general/2018/03/28/plutocracy.html
Ethereum Address:
0x6098266fd3B487492f73f7967b37c98357851161