According to ISO/IEC 9899:TC3 7.18.2.2,
"Each instance of [INTn_MIN and INTn_MAX] shall be replaced by a constant
expansion suitable for use in #if preprocessor directives, and this expression
shall have the same type as would an expression that is an object of the
corresponding type converted according to the integer promotions"
The INTn_MAX macros always violated the second requirement, and r19 means that
the INTn_MIN macros now violate both requirements.
The recommended solution would be to define the INTn_MIN / INTn_MAX macros as
follows:
#define INT8_MIN (_I8_MIN + 0)
#define INT8_MAX (_I8_MAX + 0)
#define INT16_MIN (_I16_MIN + 0)
#define INT16_MAX (_I16_MAX + 0)
#define INT32_MIN (_I32_MIN + 0)
#define INT32_MAX (_I32_MAX + 0)
#define INT64_MIN (_I64_MIN + 0)
#define INT64_MAX (_I64_MAX + 0)
#define UINT8_MAX (_UI8_MAX + 0)
#define UINT16_MAX (_UI16_MAX + 0)
#define UINT32_MAX (_UI32_MAX + 0)
#define UINT64_MAX (_UI64_MAX + 0)
Original issue reported on code.google.com by cj...@cam.ac.uk on 5 Aug 2010 at 6:28
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
cj...@cam.ac.ukon 5 Aug 2010 at 6:28