What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.
2.Create & train dataset (see outpout)
Summary of 'dataset/proj/dataset_proj.fit' (120 samples total, 1 samples per
image):
'Class label' (interpreted value) number of samples.
'0005' (5) 10
'0010' (10) 10
'0011' (11) 10
'0014' (14) 10
'0025' (25) 10
'0038' (38) 10
'0040' (40) 10
'0046' (46) 10
'0050' (50) 10
'0064' (64) 10
'0075' (75) 10
'0093' (93) 10
Class labels are purely numeric
ARGS : train params : ld50r0.5i10S800B0,0,800,350
: test params : ld50S800B0,0,800,350i6f1
3. wndchrm classify -ld50S800B0,0,800,350f1 dataset/proj/dataset_proj.fit
/root/conv-3.TIF
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Expected ouput : a document classification
See instead:
----------
image norm.
fact. p(0005) p(0010) p(0011) p(0014) p(0025) p(0038) p(0040) p(0046) p(0050) p(
0064) p(0075) p(0093) act. class pred. class pred. val.
/root/conv-9-0064.TIF 1.61e-27 0.027 0.973 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0
.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 * 0010 9.871
...
----------
WARNING: Test set class label '' does not match any training set class. Marked
with '*'.: Numerical argument out of domain
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
With both version wndchrm-1.32b.309 & wndchrm-1.50.727
On debian squeeze Linux Basesys 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Fri May 10 08:43:19 UTC
2013 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Please provide any additional information below.
All the 3 documents tested come from the training dataset . here is the dataset
test result :
Accuracy: 0.88 of total (P=6.3e-96)
0.88 ± 0.57 Avg per Class Correct of total
Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.94 (P=4.38e-57)
Mean absolute difference: 4.0444
Full details
Total Total tested: 120
Total correct: 105
Accuracy: 87.5% of total (P=6.3e-96)
Classification accuracy: 87.5 +/- 5.9% (95% confidence, normal approx
confidence interval)
Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.94 (avg P=4.38e-57)
Mean absolute difference: 4.0444
Original issue reported on code.google.com by cner...@gmail.com on 27 Nov 2013 at 9:08
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
cner...@gmail.com
on 27 Nov 2013 at 9:08