Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Incidentally, I just figured out how to connect to google accounts:
Use XMPPConnection("gmail.com") and login("username@gmail.com", "password")
Original comment by jh...@google.com
on 2 Mar 2010 at 4:33
Could you add XMPPConnection.DEBUG=true; and Connection.DEBUG=true; before
stating
the Thread? Can you provide a log of the messages send (minus the sasl part, of
course).
What does "you can receive messages" mean? Can you receive messages in your
loop and
in your chat manager or just in your loop?
TIA, René
Original comment by rtreffer@gmail.com
on 2 Mar 2010 at 9:05
I think I know this bug. You also need to listen for new Chats not only for
Messages
in your existing chat since the ChatManager class in the original Smack has a
bug
which creates for every incoming message a new Chat. This happens if the
incoming
Message hasn't got a threadid or another threadid than the message you sent.
Your
PacketCollector instead listens for all Messages it gets from the other JID no
matter
what threadid they have. A PacketListener on the connection which listens for
Message
packets should also work.
Original comment by till.klo...@gmail.com
on 2 Mar 2010 at 12:30
THX till, http://www.igniterealtime.org/issues/browse/SMACK-269 is what you
mean,
right? Sounds like I should cherry-pick that one, too.
Any objectives?
Original comment by rtreffer@gmail.com
on 2 Mar 2010 at 12:39
Yeah, thats what I meant. At the moment I completely circumvent the ChatManager
and
map the chats according to the jid. I'm completey ignoring the threadid since
most
client don't set the threadid. This works pretty fine for me.
Original comment by till.klo...@gmail.com
on 4 Mar 2010 at 12:03
Ok, I'll have to read the spec, depending on that I'd
- clone the chat manager and provide a xmpp-thread-unsafe chat manager (if
smack is
right)
- apply the patch (if smack is wrong)
Original comment by rtreffer@gmail.com
on 5 Mar 2010 at 9:41
http://xmpp.org/rfcs/rfc3921.html#rfc.section.2.1.2 looks like you're right.
Clients
MAY send a thread-id for messages, but they aren't enforced to do so.
2.1.2.3 is even worse. Looks like messages should be grouped by
jid,resource,thread
(with NULL being a correct value for grouping). Starting a thread with a thread
id is
bad because we can't be sure if a reply (if any) will contain the thread id.
Google code and any RFC viewer should implement dislike button....
Original comment by rtreffer@gmail.com
on 13 Mar 2010 at 2:38
I see there's a new build of the code. Has this issue been addressed in that
build?
Thx!
Original comment by tom.deck...@gmail.com
on 6 Apr 2010 at 5:59
Just confirmed it's fixed with asmack-2010.04.02.jar. Thanks!
Original comment by tom.deck...@gmail.com
on 8 Apr 2010 at 12:04
Oh nice, didn't see the patch that fixed it, but glad to see your problem has
been
addressed! Thanks for rechecking, and happy hacking!
Original comment by rtreffer@gmail.com
on 8 Apr 2010 at 1:00
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jh...@google.com
on 2 Mar 2010 at 4:15