Closed fsbraun closed 6 months ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
ae6ec18
) 100.00% compared to head (9c7ba4b
) 100.00%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Hi @fsbraun , Seems like that Pull Request can fix issue we have at our stage server when we upgraded to Django@4.2 and we have read-only fields.
I will look into details and let you know if it fixes so we can merge and release new version of djangocms-admin-style
@fsbraun , should it looks like that way?
@DmytroLitvinov IMHO it should look like a form with editable fields, but the inputs replaced by the fields' values. Would you expect something else?
For me it is fine that it looks like that way.
Also attaching how it looks for Django@4.2 without djangocms-admin-style
Yes, plain django admin style uses horizontal separation on large screens and vertical separation of label and field on small screens.
@vinitkumar OK for you, too? Can you review? 😎
Django admin styles have changed. This fixes the delete-link styling and the readonly-fields styling