Closed didierCH closed 5 years ago
Hello @didierCH, the field was removed as the image itself uses the native alt settings from django Filer. djangocms-picture uses that.
It is better to use the media manager (django-filer) to add metadata to the file itself. Sometimes a custom "alt" is required, for that please use the attributes field. The template takes that into consideration.
Thank you. This makes sense. Didn't know about the alt setting in django filer.
No worries 👍
In the bootstrap3 images plugin there is a field for the alt-tag (alternative text):
In the bootstrap4 image plugin this is replaced throug the figcaption element (Legend-Field in the plugin) and a figure element is created when filling that form field:![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7381262/53173490-173bf180-35e8-11e9-9d37-42107b69435d.png)
I searched the web but didn't find some evidence that you should omit the alt-tag if you have a figcaption. The only thing I found is this: https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-html5-20141028/embedded-content-0.html#when-a-text-alternative-is-not-available-at-the-time-of-publication
Could you briefly explain what considerations led to the old tag field being omitted? I now that I can add an alt-tag through the attribute button but don't want to complicate things for my users.