Open devkral opened 1 year ago
ping?
ping?
Yes, I'm not sure about this. It's a lot of noise for not much benefit as far as I can see.
Surely though, if we were adding types, a Protocol would be the way forward, rather than base class stub methods... 🤔
The problem my PR solves is, that it is not obvious for programmers how to write a layer backend. Docstrings are spread around and you have to look in channels-redis too to make sense of the functions
Agreed a protocol would be maybe better later but it needs more refactory.
I will implement this
tried it. Protocol is not the right way I think, we should use abc classes, as the BaseChannelLayer implements also some real methods
how do you think about this?
BaseChannelLayer is now abstract, the extensions are now runtime checkable Protocols.
If you think this is good, I can document the changes
Currently the layers module is untyped and BaseChannelLayer is not a real interface (lacks stub methods)
This PR adds typings and stub methods (for type hinting and getting a meaningful error in case something is missing)