Closed HenrikOssipoff closed 4 years ago
Thanks for the PR and sorry for the delay. The next release will be 3.0 which can have breaking changes. The timing of this fix is good but we also have to consider this even if we're weren't doing a major version bump - we'd just have to include in a different way.
The PR looks good. The only addition would be specifically mentioning the breaking change as a new line under the notice for the removal of the checksum functions. Thanks.
@benkonrath Thanks for the review. I've added a notice and re-worded the change log slightly. Let me know if it's good, and I'll squash the PR.
Merging #394 into master will decrease coverage by
0.01%
. The diff coverage isn/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #394 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 95.87% 95.85% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 162 162
Lines 4004 3985 -19
Branches 532 532
==========================================
- Hits 3839 3820 -19
Misses 99 99
Partials 66 66
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
localflavor/is_/is_postalcodes.py | 100% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
localflavor/id_/forms.py | 91.3% <0%> (-0.08%) |
:arrow_down: |
localflavor/ee/forms.py | 96.61% <0%> (-0.06%) |
:arrow_down: |
localflavor/generic/validators.py | 100% <0%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
localflavor/md/validators.py | 100% <0%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
localflavor/pt/forms.py | 100% <0%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
localflavor/lv/forms.py | 100% <0%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
localflavor/id_/id_choices.py | 100% <0%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
localflavor/bg/validators.py | 100% <0%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8b91c95...2eaec94. Read the comment docs.
It seems like there were missing a lot of Icelandic post codes. It also appears that the list contained a lot of post codes that are actually not valid post codes.
The list have been updated based on the official data bank from Postur.is: https://www.postur.is/en/about-us/post-offices/post-codes/data-files/
I'm not sure if this is actually a valid change, given that this removes some post codes? Should the new ones just be added, and the old ones kept?
Also note that some cities have seemingly changed names based on the newest data.
All Changes
[X] Add an entry to the docs/changelog.rst describing the change.
[X] Add an entry for your name in the docs/authors.rst file if it's not already there.