Closed reduxionist closed 3 years ago
Got it, will do!
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 10:42 AM Dylan Jay @.***> wrote:
@.**** requested changes on this pull request.
In covid_data.py https://github.com/djay/covidthailand/pull/112#discussion_r725768174:
@@ -1906,6 +1906,9 @@ def briefing_deaths_summary(text, date, file): en_risk: get_next_number(text, *th_risks, default=0, return_rest=False) for en_risk, th_risks in risks.items() }
on 2021-09-23, works risks were reported as '-' so we scrape the wrong number: 89
- if file == "inputs/briefings/230964.pdf" and risk['Work'] == 89:
I probably would have fixed this by changing the regex to handle (-) in place of 0 since this could happen again or already have happened in the past.
In covid_data.py https://github.com/djay/covidthailand/pull/112#discussion_r725768623:
@@ -1906,6 +1906,9 @@ def briefing_deaths_summary(text, date, file): en_risk: get_next_number(text, *th_risks, default=0, return_rest=False) for en_risk, th_risks in risks.items() }
on 2021-09-23, works risks were reported as '-' so we scrape the wrong number: 89
- if file == "inputs/briefings/230964.pdf" and risk['Work'] == 89:
pretty sure there is a setting in get_next_numbers to look for dash as 0
— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/djay/covidthailand/pull/112#pullrequestreview-775780587, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAD2IJYSUZUSASBIS6AMKOTUGJMI3ANCNFSM5FWIOEAQ .
I did not know 'resolve conversation' hid them from the web display. Hope you caught my reponse to your requests, and how I re-implemented the patch to fit them, via email,
bump
Fixes #80.