Closed icex2 closed 1 year ago
What's up with this?
Same here
Nit: Somewhat superfluous, the if-block is very self-explanatory, imo.
What's the impact of this change, considering the return value is a different one now? If none, then I am wondering if the return value is even evaluated correctly.
Nit: The implementation for the volume config values looks to me like a standard way for setting the volume rather than an override as the default is always 0. I would just call it config_kfca.main_volume
etc. in the struct and config file instead.
In GitLab by @xyen on Mar 16, 2022, 24:10
Commented on src/main/sdvxio/sdvxio.c line 70
sdvxhook never actually checked the result of this function, and so it succeeded, but other use-cases check the return, and ran into issues when using btools stock sdvxio.
In GitLab by @xyen on Mar 16, 2022, 24:50
Commented on src/main/sdvxhook2/nvapi.c line 50
changed this line in version 2 of the diff
In GitLab by @xyen on Mar 16, 2022, 24:50
Commented on src/main/sdvxhook2/nvapi.c line 41
changed this line in version 2 of the diff
In GitLab by @xyen on Mar 16, 2022, 24:50
Commented on src/main/sdvxhook2/dllmain.c line 160
changed this line in version 2 of the diff
In GitLab by @xyen on Mar 16, 2022, 24:50
added 1 commit
In GitLab by @xyen on Mar 16, 2022, 24:50
resolved all threads
In GitLab by @xyen on Mar 15, 2022, 08:42
_Merges sdvx_miscupdates -> master
sdvxio-kfca:
sdvxhook2:
tested locally