Closed epage closed 1 year ago
Sorry for the delay in responding. I'm not uninterested in joining a dedicated org, but I'm not sold on the value proposition:
Increase discoverability
Instead of moving repositories under a shared org, it seems like this could be accomplished by just listing and linking. There are already plenty of "awesome rust crates" repos, though I agree that many of them fail to back up recommendations with hard data. What discoverability advantages would a shared org have over listing and linking?
Improve bus factor
I like the idea of improving the bus factor, and I see how an org can help with that. However, bus factor isn't really that much of a concern to me. Even in the worst case scenario, someone could fork the repo and continue working on it.
Interested in collaborating?
Yes! I think that there's potential for some valuable collaborative work here. Here are some ideas that sound appealing to me:
These ideas raise a lot of additional questions, but pursuing some of them sounds exciting and beneficial for the community. Feel free to get in touch directly (via email, dm, or however else) if you'd like to chat some more. I'm going to close this issue for now and if we continue the discussion elsewhere (e.g. in the rosetta-rs repo) I'll link that conversation from here.
I've been maintaining several benchmark repos based off of
template-benchmarks-rs
. I've noticed there are several other benchmark repos that are hard to know about.I've created rosetta-rs org as a place for these repos if the authors so choose to
See the meta repo for more details
Interested in collaborating?