Marking as a bug since this affects how the .NET settings files are maintained. 'mkversion' is like 12 years old at this point and only uses the MAJOR.MINOR portions of the full version number for AssemblyVersion. Using MAJOR.MINOR.REVISION makes more sense for all my OSS projects at this point and would allow .NET to have different settings files for versions like "0.9.2" and "0.9.3".
Marking as a bug since this affects how the .NET settings files are maintained. 'mkversion' is like 12 years old at this point and only uses the MAJOR.MINOR portions of the full version number for AssemblyVersion. Using MAJOR.MINOR.REVISION makes more sense for all my OSS projects at this point and would allow .NET to have different settings files for versions like "0.9.2" and "0.9.3".