Closed reckart closed 9 years ago
This issue was updated by revision r2881.
- Added some more mappings
Original issue reported on code.google.com by richard.eckart
on 2014-10-04 22:23:23
I'll resolve this for the time being. If anybody wants to review the (incomplete) mappings
before 1.7.0 - please do so. Otherwise, we can have a new issue for the next version
if desired.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by richard.eckart
on 2014-11-12 08:42:59
is there any documentation about the DKPro Core types in Constituency?
(e.g. where does SBAR, SINV etc come from)
I did not find any, also not in the DKPro Core book
otherwise I would volunteer to review the mapping - had a brief look and it seems to
be a mapping where a lot of useful information is lost
Original issue reported on code.google.com by eckle.kohler
on 2014-11-12 09:55:40
Afaik the DKPro Core constituent types correspond to the Penn Treebank constituent types
as produced by the Stanford parser.
See: http://bulba.sdsu.edu/jeanette/thesis/PennTags.html
See: https://dkpro-core-asl.googlecode.com/svn/de.tudarmstadt.ukp.dkpro.core-asl/trunk/de.tudarmstadt.ukp.dkpro.core.api.syntax-asl/src/main/resources/de/tudarmstadt/ukp/dkpro/core/api/syntax/tagset/en-ptb-constituency.map
Issue 516 (formerly issue 99) contains some discussion about adopting more "universal"
tags, but this hasn't proceeded since.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by richard.eckart
on 2014-11-12 10:08:14
this is broken: http://bulba.sdsu.edu/jeanette/thesis/PennTags.html
used instead:
http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/~dm/07/autumn/795.10/ptb-annotation-guide/root.html
Original issue reported on code.google.com by eckle.kohler
on 2014-11-12 10:26:52
better overview, less detail:
http://www.surdeanu.info/mihai/teaching/ista555-fall13/readings/PennTreebankConstituents.html
Original issue reported on code.google.com by eckle.kohler
on 2014-11-12 10:28:15
I reviewd the mapping.
The mapping is designed to loose information - which is due to incompatible tagsets
(Penn tagset not making distinctions that are present in Negra)
I think, Issue 516 (formerly issue 99) is not related because it is about dependency
types - this issue here is about constituent types.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by eckle.kohler
on 2014-11-12 13:21:43
Issue 517 is about dependencies.
Issue 516 is about constituents.
Although I might have made a bad job at separating the comments from issue 99 into
the two new issues - there is also some overlap.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by richard.eckart
on 2014-11-12 14:20:02
This issue was updated by revision r3008.
- Added/changed 5 mappings based on expert-feedback from JEK
Original issue reported on code.google.com by richard.eckart
on 2014-11-12 14:42:31
I've just created a 1.7.x branch. Should r3008 be merged into it?
Original issue reported on code.google.com by pedrobssantos
on 2014-11-12 14:48:05
Yes, please ;)
Original issue reported on code.google.com by richard.eckart
on 2014-11-12 16:42:53
(No text was entered with this change)
Original issue reported on code.google.com by richard.eckart
on 2014-11-12 16:52:10
(No text was entered with this change)
Original issue reported on code.google.com by pedrobssantos
on 2014-11-12 16:57:28
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
richard.eckart
on 2014-10-02 14:41:33