Use "universal" categories for constituents

[reckart]

This issue is a fork of issue 99 where this topic has originally been discussed. Here
the relevant entries:

---

#7 eckle.kohler

the CoNLL-2009 Shared Task:

Syntactic and Semantic Dependencies in Multiple Languages could be useful in this context.
see:
http://www.aclweb.org/anthology-new/W/W09/W09-1201.pdf
"we have prepared a unified format and data for
several very different lanaguages, as a basis
for possible extensions towards other languages
and unified treatment of syntactic depenndecies
and semantic role labeling across natural lan-
guages;"

have to look into the data, though

---

#8 richard.eckart

I believe they just unified the file format, not the tagset. We have readers and writers
for the file format btw (io.conll).

---

 #11 richard.eckart

This looks very interesting:

http://www.ryanmcd.com/papers/treebanksACL2013.pdf
https://code.google.com/p/uni-dep-tb/

---

Original issue reported on code.google.com by richard.eckart on 2014-11-12 10:02:51

[reckart]

(No text was entered with this change)

Original issue reported on code.google.com by eckle.kohler on 2014-11-12 13:22:40

[reckart]

(No text was entered with this change)

Original issue reported on code.google.com by richard.eckart on 2014-11-12 14:19:01

[zesch]

Is this a duplicate of #517 ?

[reckart]

Yep. Closing.

[reckart]

Sorry, not a duplicate.

• 76 - universal pos tags (POS type)

• 516 - universal constituents (Constituent type)

• 517 - universal dependencies (Dependency type)