Avoid redundancy of semantic labels?

dkpro / dkpro-uby

Framework for creating and accessing UBY resources – sense-linked lexical resources in standard UBY-LMF format

https://dkpro.github.io/dkpro-uby

Other

22 stars 3 forks source link

Avoid redundancy of semantic labels? #111

Open judithek opened 9 years ago

judithek commented 9 years ago

In UBY-WordNet, domain labels are stored at three positions:
* as part of the gloss (Definition.TextRepresentation) as a bracketed prefix
* as a SemanticLabel
* as a SenseRelation of type topic

Discuss if the redundancy is necessary. Keep in mind that WordNet users might want
the bracketed prefix in order to reproduce results of the original WordNet. Same applies
to some extent to SenseRelation...

Original issue reported on code.google.com by chmeyer.de on 2014-10-09 09:20:06

judithek commented 9 years ago

I would keep the redundancy because
1) it is created automatically (and thus consistently) - Uby is read-only
2) applications might depend on one of the 3 variants
3) we claim that one of our main goals is to preserve the information present in the
original resources

Original issue reported on code.google.com by eckle.kohler on 2014-10-09 18:18:08