Closed hoangvietdo closed 1 year ago
Thanks for looking into the BROAD dataset! :)
If I'm not mistaken, the NaN
values should only appear in opt_quat
and opt_pos
. Those values indicate short gaps in which the optical motion capture system failed to track at least one of the reflective markers. We decided to not fill those gaps using interpolation but instead exclude the corresponding samples from the error calculation. This can easily be done in Python and Matlab by using the nanmean
function for the RMSE calculation:
Could you please confirm that the NaN
values you found are indeed short gaps in the optical reference data?
Thanks for your fast response!
I indeed found the NaN
value in the opt_quat
.
When I convert them to the Euler angle and plot them, I witness a lot of discontinuous parts due to the NaN
value.
I'm fully aware of the problem with the optical system, so I can somehow guess the reason.
Thanks for your information.
Thanks for sharing your incredible work!
I've witnessed some
NaN
values in the .mat file (e.g., dataset number01
and04
). Is it a bug, or there are some underlying reasons for this?