@ryuukk this supersedes that PR you made that extended the type details to foo -> T syntax. I decided to only have the resolved type here, there is a fallback to use the function name on unknown types though. We could probably expose this information elsewhere though and show it somehow in serve-d.
@vushu there is a single UFCS line fix in here, which you probably want to include in your PR as well
If any of you could also review, that would be nice.
supersedes PR fix #715
@ryuukk this supersedes that PR you made that extended the type details to
foo -> T
syntax. I decided to only have the resolved type here, there is a fallback to use the function name on unknown types though. We could probably expose this information elsewhere though and show it somehow in serve-d.@vushu there is a single UFCS line fix in here, which you probably want to include in your PR as well
If any of you could also review, that would be nice.