Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
I've seen this happen on Windows 7 (but not XP). I'm sorry but I have no idea
about the cause, it seems external to tun2socks, that is, the OS just stops
routing packets into tun2socks. You can try playing with stuff in Network
Connection and Windows Firewall, and check the Windows Event Log.
Original comment by ambr...@gmail.com
on 11 Mar 2013 at 4:31
Yes, this is on Windows 7.
I'm looking at my routing tables and as you say it seems that Windows is just
ignoring them.
What about removing the other 0.0.0.0 route, essentially meaning that all other
traffic must go through 10.0.0.2?
Original comment by mi...@wangled.com
on 11 Mar 2013 at 4:33
Monitoring the virtual network interface with Wireshark may also provide some
hints. One suspicion I have is that something in Windows is deciding that the
route doesn't work and disables it silently.
Original comment by ambr...@gmail.com
on 11 Mar 2013 at 4:33
Yes, removing the default route entry does the job. I've now been connected for
about 10 minutes and connections are still going through as they should.
It looks like it is something MS changed in their implementation from Vista
onwards:
http://serverfault.com/questions/255799/windows-vista-and-7-dont-honor-routing-t
able-metric
Apart from that tun2socks works great by the way.. very smooth!
Original comment by mi...@wangled.com
on 11 Mar 2013 at 4:45
Ok, I guess there's nothing that can be done from tun2socks about this problem.
Original comment by ambr...@gmail.com
on 11 Mar 2013 at 4:48
Issue 9 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by ambr...@gmail.com
on 24 Apr 2013 at 11:10
Issue 9 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by ambr...@gmail.com
on 24 Apr 2013 at 11:23
Issue 9 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by ambr...@gmail.com
on 24 Apr 2013 at 11:35
Issue 9 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by ambr...@gmail.com
on 24 Apr 2013 at 12:04
Issue 9 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by ambr...@gmail.com
on 24 Apr 2013 at 12:13
Issue 9 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by ambr...@gmail.com
on 24 Apr 2013 at 12:16
Issue 9 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by ambr...@gmail.com
on 24 Apr 2013 at 1:19
Issue 9 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by ambr...@gmail.com
on 24 Apr 2013 at 1:20
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mi...@wangled.com
on 11 Mar 2013 at 4:23