Open dmarx opened 2 years ago
keywords that are think are interesting here:
https://namelix.com/app/?keywords=multimodal+encoder+similarity+comparator+dot+product+clip
suggested there:
https://namelix.com/app/?keywords=multimodal+encoder+similarity+comparator+clip+perceptor
my ideas:
I kind of think dual-encoder might be good Maybe having clip in the name would be nice though, so mulclip maybe ?
Ok I'll leave that here, maybe that gives ideas
agreed that Multi-Modal-Comparators is a bit long
problem of mmc is it's not googleable, you can't find it in google Multi-Modal-Comparators is googleable
maybe multimodal-comparators ?
multimodal-comparators
yeah, it's an improvement
problem of mmc is it's not googleable
I guess... you'd think the same would be true for "timm" but they don't seem to have a problem there. maybe "python mmc" will pull this up if it ends up becoming more popular
one thing I like about "mmc" is the simplicity of pip install mmc
. I worry that pip install multimodal-comparators
might be a spelling challenge for many users, in particular those with limited english proficiency. gotta pick our battles I guess. maybe writing out two words isn't an unreasonable ask.
Maybe having clip in the name would be nice though, so mulclip maybe ?
the reason I didn't go this route to begin with is that I didn't want to constrain this library to just CLIP models. Maybe that was over-ambitious or a pre-mature optimization?
maybe we could do some sort of riff on "multimodality" in general? Maybe something to do with synaesthesia? (speaking of making it a spelling challenge..)
...not a huge fan of any of these lol
crossmodal seems pretty good. nothing seems to be called that way
but yeah maybe just mmc "github mmc" is googleable
One Perceptor To RulE Them All - OPTETA
Or something like that
"mmc" is fine, "multi-modal comparators" is awful. Maybe "zero-shot classifiers?" zsc is nice and memorable