Open MaestSi opened 5 years ago
Hi @MaestSi
Are the VCFs for your runs share-able. I could take a look by eye at the changes and see if anything looks like a regression from 0.1.8 to 0.1.10.
Manta is a strong individual caller, especially for smaller events. Within Parliament2, Manta provides the largest individual contribution to accuracy (though for larger events, it is surpassed by some of the other methods).
Hi @MaestSi
Thank you for reporting this. I am still looking into the issues and don't yet have an obvious answer. I noticed that the 1.10 calls seem to have fewer calls from MANTA, both as a whole and those which have PASS. I am looking into whether anything has changed with this that could cause calls to drop or be filtered. And I will report back again here.
Thanks, Andrew
Hi @AndrewCarroll , did you further inspect this issue, or do you have any updates about the Parliament2 project? Thanks, Simone
Hi Parliament2 developers, I am writing to ask for some explanations, since it looks like to me there has been quite a change in performances between versions 0.1.8 and 0.1.10 - towards higher precision and lower sensitivity - and I would like to know if this is something done on purpose and if anybody else experienced this too. I am running Parliament2 on a 30X bam file obtained mapping Illumina paired-end reads from NA24385 sample and then evaluating performances with Truvari based on a set of GIAB high-confidence calls (ftp://ftp-trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/giab/ftp/data/AshkenazimTrio/analysis/NIST_SVs_Integration_v0.6/). Here are my results: SV-type ||| Parliament2 v0.1.8 sens/prec ||| Parliament2 v0.1.10 sens/prec DELs ||| 69%/32% ||| 67%/64% DELs PASS ||| 69%/78% ||| 49%/83% INSs ||| 22%/53% ||| 22%/52% INSs PASS ||| 20%/91% ||| 20%/93%
In summary, I noticed that DELs (without PASS filtering) seem to be more precise, however when the PASS filtering is applied the sensitivity tends to drop from 69% to 49%. Is this more "conservative" filtering something wanted, or maybe is it a consequence of updating the versions of the callers without updating the weights accordingly? Moreover I was surprised by the fact that for Manta my results look very strong for DELs. I have to say that for Parliament2 I am not able to run breakseq2, since I am using hg38 reference genome, so my Parliament2 results might be negatively affected by this.
SV-type ||| Manta sens/prec DELs ||| 67%/92% DELs PASS ||| 63%/93% INSs ||| 22%/87% INSs PASS ||| 21%/88%
Thank you.