Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I'm not sure why we'd add this if we weren't also planning to use it in Guava
itself?
Original comment by lowas...@google.com
on 20 Nov 2012 at 9:32
Presumably that criteria ("used in Guava itself") doesn't hold for all new
features/code. Why should annotations be treated differently? The annotation
may still be useful for other developers.
I appreciate Guava high power-to-weight ratio, so if this annotation doesn't
have widespread appeal, I accept it shouldn't be included in Guava.
Original comment by thomasfi...@gmail.com
on 25 Nov 2012 at 10:05
I am but one person, but this annotation sure does appeal to me. Would use it
if made available.
Original comment by stephan...@gmail.com
on 26 Nov 2012 at 6:13
The need to subclass a class for testing purposes that could have been final
otherwise is a pretty strong design smell to me. We doubt an annotation like
this is necessary, and we'd have to believe very *strongly in favor* of it to
want to add it to Guava.
Original comment by kevinb@google.com
on 28 Nov 2012 at 1:30
This issue has been migrated to GitHub.
It can be found at https://github.com/google/guava/issues/<id>
Original comment by cgdecker@google.com
on 1 Nov 2014 at 4:13
Original comment by cgdecker@google.com
on 3 Nov 2014 at 9:08
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
thomasfi...@gmail.com
on 20 Nov 2012 at 9:29