Open banburybill opened 6 years ago
Hi Tim, At 02:31 AM 07-07-2018, Tim Wicinski wrote:
There were initial concerns that the IPR was unclear, and never fully settled. All the guidance I received was that the issue would be addressed https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2909/ Yes, it is old, but it was the only reference I could dig up.
There were initial concerns that the IPR was unclear, and never fully settled. All the guidance I received was that the issue would be addressed
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2909/
Yes, it is old, but it was the only reference I could dig up.
Thank you for the URL. The Tracker does not list the IPR disclosure for the WG draft. I suggest looking at Section 3.3 of RFC 6702 [1].
Regards, S. Moonesamy
Hi Tim, At 02:31 AM 07-07-2018, Tim Wicinski wrote:
Thank you for the URL. The Tracker does not list the IPR disclosure for the WG draft. I suggest looking at Section 3.3 of RFC 6702 [1].
Regards, S. Moonesamy