Closed jrubenoff closed 9 years ago
So a stupid question... you mention:
It's too dissimilar to Franklin Gothic to have the refined look I'm going for.
Why not just use a lighter weight of Franklin Gothic for the display typeface?
Also, next time, I think we should create a new Typekit "kit" instead of modifying the existing one... right?
Anyway, feel free to merge :+1:
I'm gonna merge this myself so I can merge other stuff :)
Why not just use a lighter weight of Franklin Gothic for the display typeface?
Problem is, it's not on TypeKit.
The light weights aren't? Weird.
I was trying to improve the blog's design, and work on our layout for plain-text pages (like the Terms and Conditions pages). I was having a lot of trouble working with Source Sans Pro. It's too dissimilar to Franklin Gothic to have the refined look I'm going for. So I spent this afternoon switching our display typeface.
I also adjusted the size of our
h1
andh2
so that the difference should be negligible:None of our layouts should be broken by this change, because the type takes up the same amount of space. A quick check across most of our repos confirms this: zero bugs. Still, different typefaces are different, so I've made some optimizations across our other repos.
Also, this looks :100: in IE9.