Closed jrubenoff closed 8 years ago
Is the "to do" for me?
Also, I would strongly recommend using either a generic utility class (.hidden
), or a form-scoped utility class (.form_label_hidden
) instead of scattering @include hidden
everywhere... it'll save us a ton of bytes.
The to-do is for you; wasn't sure how to add it myself.
.form_label_hidden
sounds good.
Also would like your :+1: on the implementation. It's a little awkward from an i18n perspective, but this comment gives the impression that there's no better approach... :confused:
Sorry this is still sitting. I want to get to it, but the implementation needs to change pretty much wholesale, in order to work properly with simple_form
.
If you can answer my Q's inline about the CSS, that will help me figure out how to properly implement it.
Alright, I'm fine with whatever implementation you decide as long as the markup and CSS classes remain roughly the same.
If we have to choose one, I am strongly biased towards semantics / accessibility over developer efficiency.
If we have to choose one, I am strongly biased towards semantics / accessibility over developer efficiency.
I would not like to sacrifice either for the other.
Closed by #251.
Closes #234
To-do:
Choose a date
andChoose a time
labels to date picker, and hide them with@include hidden