Closed ajb closed 9 years ago
Can you clarify why you made this change? They weren't select
s before. Also, if they're buttons, why not make them <button>
tags?
Also note that I plan to change the styling again later this week: https://dobt.wake.io/184
Sorry, I didn't realize that it wasn't as obvious to others. We can make them button tags, yes, since the .button class doesn't care.
The problem with .dropdown_toggle_button is that it was often used next to
a .button
, but the height wouldn't match up. It seemed like a really
weird pattern that if we still need it, should just be a modifier of
.button
.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Josh Rubenoff notifications@github.com wrote:
Can you clarify why you made this change? They weren't selects before. Also, if they're buttons, why not make them
Also note that I plan to change the styling again later this week: https://dobt.wake.io/184
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/dobtco/dvl-core/pull/73#issuecomment-92524623.
Adam Becker (951) 9-BECKER @AdamJacobBecker
Alright. LGTM for now!
Thanks -- hrm, I'm just feeling weird that I'm actively making elements look worse. Maybe I should add a modifier to the button, like .is_toggle
, that restores some of the style?
Sure... maybe add back the border and background color?
:+1:
Closes https://github.com/dobtco/dvl-core/issues/72.
Before
After
@jrubenoff, am I overlooking anything? I think the "before" looks better, but "after" makes a lot more sense, since these are buttons, not
<select>
s.For reference, this is the main place they'll be used: