search

docker-library / buildpack-deps

MIT License
445 stars 113 forks source link

Add Ubuntu Lunar Lobster 23.04 #138

Closed vicamo closed 1 year ago

vicamo commented 1 year ago

Signed-off-by: You-Sheng Yang (vicamo) vicamo@gmail.com

yosifkit commented 1 year ago

~Ubuntu 23.04 is currently a development release. We are not going to add this before 23.04 is released, so this will need to wait until then (April 2023).~

Never mind, I was wrong. We do have unstable releases in buildpack-deps images.

tianon commented 1 year ago

Never mind, I was wrong. We do have unstable releases in buildpack-deps images.

This is my bad -- originally we had official use cases for unstable releases (like the old openjdk images), but now I think it's less defensible than previously. I'd like to remove buildpack-deps:sid, but I'm not sure how widely used it is outside of official images, and I think beyond that explicit named releases probably are mostly harmless? :sweat_smile:

vicamo commented 1 year ago

Never mind, I was wrong. We do have unstable releases in buildpack-deps images.

This is my bad -- originally we had official use cases for unstable releases (like the old openjdk images), but now I think it's less defensible than previously. I'd like to remove buildpack-deps:sid, but I'm not sure how widely used it is outside of official images, and I think beyond that explicit named releases probably are mostly harmless? 😅

https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/blob/master/.gitlab-ci.yml Hi, unstable and devel tags are critical to people who develop software. It's the base environment for some testing frameworks just like the latest tags do. Please do add these tags as long as they become available.

tianon commented 1 year ago

Sorry, I should've been more explicit - if we could go back, I probably wouldn't add them to buildpack-deps, but they definitely still make sense in debian and ubuntu (although the latter is now entirely up to Canonical's discretion whether they will continue publishing those), and that's the image being used in that .gitlab-ci.yml. :smile:

At this point, we've already got them here and I think it probably makes sense to continue for consistency and because it's really useful to have at least the -curl and -scm variants for all released, to-be-released, and in-development suites of these distributions even if they aren't widely used within the official images directly.