Picture of animal in PR should really be optional

[eunomie]

Because it's only folklore and should not be a blocker.

- What I did

Just removed the but encouraged about picture of animal in PR template

- How I did it

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #722 into master will decrease coverage by 1.48%. The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #722      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   72.45%   70.96%   -1.49%     
==========================================
  Files          59       59              
  Lines        3438     3031     -407     
==========================================
- Hits         2491     2151     -340     
+ Misses        612      589      -23     
+ Partials      335      291      -44

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
internal/commands/run.go	60.22% <0%> (-9.86%)	:arrow_down:
internal/commands/remove.go	52% <0%> (-8.57%)	:arrow_down:
internal/store/bundle.go	68.93% <0%> (-7.75%)	:arrow_down:
internal/commands/update.go	58.18% <0%> (-7.21%)	:arrow_down:
internal/cnab/cnab.go	63.33% <0%> (-6.24%)	:arrow_down:
internal/commands/image/list.go	83.33% <0%> (-5.82%)	:arrow_down:
types/parameters/parameters.go	92.06% <0%> (-4.77%)	:arrow_down:
internal/commands/push.go	45.22% <0%> (-2.57%)	:arrow_down:
internal/commands/image/tag.go	88.88% <0%> (-1.31%)	:arrow_down:
internal/store/digest.go	86.36% <0%> (-0.82%)	:arrow_down:
... and 1 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update 6267dc4...03792ed. Read the comment docs.

[eunomie]

Well, encouraged is not a blocker...

Yep, blocker is maybe too strong.

And it's explicit that it's not mandatory.

Yes, but it's explicit that is encouraged and I don't think it's necessary.

[rumpl]

Could you add some tests? The coverage seems to go down with this PR