Open kodedylf opened 1 month ago
Thanks for reporting!
Hm... yes, that's a good one; I know we tried to write up a minimal-as-possible example just to illustrate the concept, but indeed running things in the background can be slightly tricky, or at least to keep things "simple" as well as (where possible) working across platforms (mac, linux, windows).
I guess a "scrappy" workaround here could be to have the user open two separate shells; one to run the Python server and another one to run the docker commands to connect to it.
@neersighted @dvdksn any thoughts / ideas ?
@thaJeztah How about using Docker Compose?
# Use the official Python image
FROM python:3.9-slim
WORKDIR /usr/src/app
COPY hello.txt .
CMD ["python3", "-m", "http.server", "8000"]
2. Now create a file named docker-compose.yml
version: '3.8'
services: python-server: build: context: . ports:
"8000:8000"
curl-client: image: curlimages/curl depends_on:
3. Build and Run the Containers
docker-compose up --build
Right, but the host.docker.internal
feature was added for users to have an option to connect to a services that's not running inside a container, so some service on the host. For the docker-compose case, the recommended approach would for the curl-client
service to connect with the python-server
service through the internal network (are least; "don't map ports that shouldn't be accessible publicly").
In the documentation at https://github.com/docker/cli/blob/master/docs/reference/commandline/container_run.md#add-host, a python3 web server is run to server the
hello
file.However, as shown, the command will run in the foreground and the user will be unable to run the rest of the commands in the same terminal session. If the user presses ctrl-c to terminate python to be able to run the container, the example won't work since the web server isn't running.
My own solution was to run python3 in the background by adding
&
to the command. However then I needed to kill the web server after running the container. Getting the pid and killing python isn't very elegant. Hopefully you can come up with a better solution.