Open crazy-max opened 2 years ago
Things to look for;
$pkgRevision
in them; sounds like it's useful to have so that we can do a packaging-only build (e.g. $pkgRevision=1
or $pkgRevision=2
)-r0
suffix in the .apk
package?0.10.0-rc2
) and make sure it uses tilde (~
) not hyphen (-
) for the pre-release suffix_<arch>
vs .<arch>
is something we control, or is that standard convention / automatic difference between rpm
and deb
?1804
vs 18.04
; see https://github.com/docker/docker-ce-packaging/pull/817#discussion_r1066942240)ubuntu.22.10~kinetic
) and what separator to use; https://github.com/docker/docker-ce-packaging/blob/6e7d52709586ca25e53ce46fc61b35bf9385a7a0/deb/build-deb#L50-L75
Atm following distro packages matrix is in place in this repo:
centos
7
docker-buildx-plugin-0.8.1-centos7.x86_64.rpm
centos
8
docker-buildx-plugin-0.8.1-centos8.x86_64.rpm
fedora
33
docker-buildx-plugin-0.8.1-fedora33.x86_64.rpm
fedora
34
docker-buildx-plugin-0.8.1-fedora34.x86_64.rpm
fedora
35
docker-buildx-plugin-0.8.1-fedora35.x86_64.rpm
fedora
36
docker-buildx-plugin-0.8.1-fedora36.x86_64.rpm
debian
10
docker-buildx-plugin_0.8.1-debian10_amd64.deb
debian
11
docker-buildx-plugin_0.8.1-debian11_amd64.deb
alpine
r0
docker-buildx-plugin_0.8.1-r0_x86_64.apk
raspbian
10
docker-buildx-plugin_0.8.1-raspbian10_amd64.deb
raspbian
11
docker-buildx-plugin_0.8.1-raspbian11_amd64.deb
ubuntu
1804
docker-buildx-plugin_0.8.1-ubuntu1804_amd64.deb
ubuntu
2004
docker-buildx-plugin_0.8.1-ubuntu2004_amd64.deb
ubuntu
2110
docker-buildx-plugin_0.8.1-ubuntu2110_amd64.deb
ubuntu
2204
docker-buildx-plugin_0.8.1-ubuntu2204_amd64.deb
@thaJeztah Looking at this issue https://github.com/docker/for-linux/issues/1315 I guess the current behavior here is correct. Should we align docker-ce-packaging and containerd-package repos with this release scheme?