Open teagles opened 2 years ago
I sure can. Before I do I was tinkering with making it even more user friendly by including an ASG that defaults to 0 capacity so all the user has to do is scale that up and down to activate or deactivate an instance. Would that mode of operation be preferable to using Launch Instance with the template as I'm using it now?
Actually I just remembered why I didn't do that initially. It would require more mandatory Config to pre-seed an ssh key. I'll instead focus on an addendum to the docs that outlines the current use.
This other pull request makes things even easier but I'll leave it up to you if you want to retain these changes for the proposed option 2.
Hi, thanks, I'll try to review these tomorrow!
I do like the ease of the ecs exec method, I want to get a better understanding on if there are limitations or issues on editing files during runtime though. If it can be done with the cloudshell then I think it's a winner. I do appreciate your work on the launch template and think it's worth including some of it for sure. Apologies for the severe delays on reviewing these, I've been a little busy with work. Thanks.
What I might do if I get time on the weekend (or later) is layering my stuff on the other change with some extra documentation and changes for the cloud shell and offline edit scenarios.
Hey this looks great. I'd like to test it out soon and will merge later. Do you want to draft any text for how a user might interface with the instance for file maintenance? I'm slowly but surely working through the CDK docs to be more user friendly. Thanks.