search

docusealco / docuseal

Open source DocuSign alternative. Create, fill, and sign digital documents ✍️
https://www.docuseal.co
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
5.61k stars 371 forks source link

`fields` key of second submitter seems to be ignored #200

Closed ko-pp closed 5 months ago

ko-pp commented 5 months ago

Hello

I am currently testing DocuSeal with a two-parties template and sending through the API.

We have a bunch of values for each party but they are all filled by us and set as readonly in the API payload, except for one field per party (plus signature) that has a validation pattern and an error message.

With the first party, everything work as expected*, but for the second one, every field stays RW and the validation pattern is ignored (the attribute is missing on the input element), which seems to point to fields being ignored for the second submitter.

omohokcoj commented 5 months ago

@ko-pp thanks for reporting this - there was a bug that prevented the correct assignment of default values of the 2nd+ parties. It's has been already fixed on production Cloud and will be released in the open-source app next week.

ko-pp commented 5 months ago

It does work for us on the Cloud’s testing env. Thank you