dogtwelve / eepp

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/eepp
0 stars 0 forks source link

Error compiling project using the default allegro #1

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I tried to build the project using the project file provided for in wndows 
Code:: Blocks.
He's returning me the error in line "mBackend eeNew = (Backend:: Al: 
cBackendAl, ());" and the line "CWindow eeNew * window = (Backend:: Al: 
cWindowAl, (Settings, Context)) , "file" src / windows / cengine.cpp. "
The errors returned are the first line:
error: expected type-specifier
error: can not convert 'int *' to 'EE:: Window:: Backend:: cBackend *' in 
assignment
error: expected ';'
and the second line:
error: expected type-specifier
error: can not convert 'int *' to 'EE:: Window:: CWindow *' in initialization
error: expected ',' or ','

In building on Linux using the supplied Makefile file, got no errors, it was 
built successfully.

Note: Follow all espcificações the README file.

I took the same project file Code:: Blocks provided the framework to build on 
linux and got the same problem on windows by setting reminding allegro backend 
by default.

Does any configuration to build the code:: blocks?.

Settings used:
Linux ubuntu 11 with gcc 4.5.2 standard libraries installed
Windows 7 mingw32 gcc 4.4.1 with the same libraries installed
Both using 32 b

Sorry for my English, I am Brazilian.

This is a great job of you hope to help.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by dudu.li...@gmail.com on 20 Sep 2011 at 5:18

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Hi dudu!
I'm probably a little late to reply your issue, i didn't activated the email 
notification for new issues, and never saw the message ( as you can see, you 
are the first person adding an issue, because... nobody use eepp besides me :P 
). So, sorry for that.
Regarding the issue i think that may be you forgot to define the default 
back-end to Allegro ( Build Options -> Defines -> BACKEND_ALLEGRO ), but i'll 
check it. I recommend you to use SDL 1.3 as back-end, because it's the most 
complete in features and is stable.

Original comment by spart...@gmail.com on 9 Nov 2011 at 11:12

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Closed.

Original comment by spart...@gmail.com on 30 Sep 2012 at 6:20