Closed dylans closed 6 years ago
We should probably do this sooner rather than later, in case there is anything that needs addressing.
@agubler is it worth posting our earlier tests pre d
, and post d
here for posterity? we can then keep tracking performance as we progress.
@matt-gadd nice idea.
Some benching marking results using https://github.com/kriszyp/todomvc-perf-comparison
:
Pre d
widget management:
Post d
widget management:
It's more important to focus on the comparison of dojo2
timings than the comparison of dojo2
against the other frameworks (as they are using a static version todo-mvc contained in https://github.com/kriszyp/todomvc-perf-comparison repo)
In fact I use https://github.com/agubler/todomvc-perf-comparison which has the tastejs todomvc examples sub-moduled and extra tests added for dojo
, vue
, typescript-react
(and more)
Current perf metrics for widget-core
release 2.0.0-beta1.4 running for 100 todos.
We have implemented js-framework-benchmark tests to run as part of CI on widget-core, which can provide a mechanism to track performance. I think this issue can now be closed.
Around beta, we should make a performance test available for comparison, either a fork of https://github.com/evancz/todomvc-perf-comparison or https://github.com/kriszyp/todomvc-perf-comparison