dokkaner / teemii

A versatile, self-hosted manga reader and manager with extensible agent-based metadata retrieval
https://www.teemii.io
MIT License
308 stars 19 forks source link

Nonexisten import/rescan #55

Closed tenekev closed 9 months ago

tenekev commented 9 months ago

Description

The only way I can introduce new content is by searching and then downloading it veeeery slowly.

  1. There is no option to batch request all chapters. I get that the idea is to download them slowly and responsibly but clicking >150 times to get all chapters is unrealistic.
  2. Importing new content does not work. A .cbz file is loaded into the UI, matched with the appropriate content either automatically or manually but nothing happens when I click Import. Nothing comes up in the logs either. It's like the frontend for importing isn't connected.
  3. There is no way to rescan an existing library. I ran into this issue in conjunction with #54. The container filled all the available storage which resulted in a corrupt config file. Recreating the container and reconfiguring the backend, doesn't recover any previously downloaded content. It sits in the /data/mangas directory but it's essentially invisible to the server.

Version

0.8.0

Steps to Reproduce

Described above

Screenshots

No response

Logs

No response

Platform

desktop

Device

Web

Operating System

Linux

Browser

Edge

Additional Context

No response

Code of Conduct

dokkaner commented 9 months ago

1 - As stated in the documentation: You may queue multiple chapters for download one after the other; however, Teemii is designed to download them one at a time. This approach is deliberate to prevent excessive downloading and to ensure responsible use of resources.

The philosophy behind this is not to accumulate chapters that you may or may not read, but to download the ones you do read as you go along. It's not definitive, but that's how it's expected to work.

2 - If possible can you share the name of the cbz? Any log in the dev console of the browser?

3 - already proposed in the feature list: Feature: Directory Scan #18

ps: I move this issue to the discussions