Open johnboiles opened 5 years ago
Looks like this is the place 1 atm is assumed for pressure. Though maybe variance here would affect the resulting output so little that it's not worth considering.
Hey @johnboiles i think this would be a nice addition. Even tough you are right that it probably wouldn't change the results in most cases (I'd guess about 0,01°C at most). It would be still optional and would be nice to know my air pressure sensors would at least have some job to do.
People do live at different altitudes though, so while the day-to-day variation may be low, even allowing for a statistically configured pressure (but might as well be a sensor input at that point) might yield meaningful differences in sensor readings for those people. (I'm not one of those people btw -- I am at about .99 atm most of the time hah)
I second this, especially as the new Aquara sensors seem to support pressure readings as well. Looking at the code and the linked calculation method, it will be necessary to add a second calculation code path instead of adjusting the existing one, as both calculation methods differ too much.
Reading the code, I assume that a fixed value is used for pressure as an approximation. It might be nice to be able to pass in a pressure value from an atmospheric pressure sensor to make these values more accurate.