Closed tfield closed 12 years ago
Thanks fine, maybe we should version all to 3.0.
How about 11? (less than one-half joking)
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Dolf Dijkstra < reply@reply.github.com
wrote:
Thanks fine, maybe we should version all to 3.0.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/dolfdijkstra/gst-foundation/issues/1#issuecomment-7462873
The pattern we have been using so far is to increment the facades package name by 0.1 with each .1 release of the GSF.
When GSF 1.3 was released, Facades was incremented from 2.3 to 2.4.
The 1.3 branch of the GSF is now closed except for 0.0.1 increments for compatibility on 7.x, so there will never be a GSF 1.4.
For GSF 3 we can sync up Facades, but I suggest that for GSF 2, we start with Facades 2.5, which would give GSF 1.3 some room for point-releases in the 2.4 namespace.
Are you ok with that?