Closed ktrehaeven closed 1 year ago
Hello @ktrehaeven . This is Eq. A5 of Arevalo et al. 2012 :
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.426.1793A/abstract
This equation relates the standard deviation of the Gaussian scale for the Mexican Hat filter to the wave number. Here sckpc is the sigma of the Mexican Hat filter, not the actual filtering scale, which is still 1/k. See Fig. 2 of Arevalo et al. 2012.
Ok then something like k = 0.01 kpc^-1 does indeed translate to a physical scale of 100 kpc?
Yes, that's right. But that doesn't correspond to the sigma of the Mexican Hat filter.
Hi. May I please ask for some clarification on something?
The amplitude plots of the power spectrum analysis are plotted with k on the x-axis, with units of kpc^-1. But in the code k is defined as
self.k = 1. / np.sqrt(2. * np.pi ** 2) * np.divide(1., sckpc)
, wheresckpc
I believe is the physical scale in kpc. This is where get confused. To find the physical scale that k corresponds to, do I need to invert this equation and solve for sckpc? I.e the physical scale is not just 1/k but the filtering factor np.sqrt(2. * np.pi ** 2) needs to be accounted for. Is this right?I apologize for the very basic question - I just cant convince myself of the logic either way :)