As of 19318d31acc2812bde19ae654babdd5dce5742ff it is not up to date with the spec, as it does not handle exceptions in Promise.race per the new behavior. Also, as discovered in #42, internal properties are not inherited, so the way they are currently done is wrong. And the @@create stuff was never quite right.
As #6 is implemented, the delta between how the spec talks about things (with completion values) and how the testable implementation does (by not delving to that level) will grow. So I'll take a pause on updating the testable implementation alongside the spec. Once things settle, especially #6, I will go back and re-do it.
[x] @@create vs. constructor semantics are too fake
[x] Internal properties should not be inherited; currently scheme is too simple.
[x] Completion values are not handled
[ ] Make sure all the tests still pass with the updated implementation
As of 19318d31acc2812bde19ae654babdd5dce5742ff it is not up to date with the spec, as it does not handle exceptions in
Promise.raceper the new behavior. Also, as discovered in #42, internal properties are not inherited, so the way they are currently done is wrong. And the@@createstuff was never quite right.As #6 is implemented, the delta between how the spec talks about things (with completion values) and how the testable implementation does (by not delving to that level) will grow. So I'll take a pause on updating the testable implementation alongside the spec. Once things settle, especially #6, I will go back and re-do it.
@@createvs. constructor semantics are too fake