Closed ShaneQful closed 11 years ago
I think that the code should be peer reviewed. Plus it makes it a little unfair especially if you commit code that doesn't comply with the style guide.
Unless there is a way to separate the role of managing the repository and developing it so that the code can be approved by multiple people then it doesn't really matter. As the decision making power is granted to @ShaneQful and @ograycode at the end of the day.
If there were a way to make it that all contributors could QA/review the pull requests then that would be ideal. However this could also slow the development process down.
Personal I really don't care too much about how the repo is managed provided that we work towards the same goals, work in a productive manner and produce a good quality application.
The other problem is testing. We will need to define exactly how we intend to test this application. How can you QA something without defining what we are looking for?
At this point, I am always willing to do a pull request for it to be reviewed before.
I haven't been too active on this project because of work and personal commitments these past two weeks, but hope to be soon.
@ograycode will you be willing to merge my pull requests?
Ya. I may wait a day or two for comments, as I'm more interested in it working than style, unless it's just grossly wrong.
Awesome peer review ftw :)
Now that me and @ograycode have push access to the repo. I have just been pushing my commit straight up with no peer review would people prefer if I/We used pull requests so our code was reviewed before it was let into the repo?
On a side note due to my pushing straight from my repo, the player now works for the feeds and the audio live streams :)